Levy Committee: Israel not an occupier but a proud apartheid state

I woke up to this smiling face today though it’s not as bad as what Edmond Levy and his panel of dreamers just released to the Israeli Prime Minister’s office.

Israel’s judicial underbelly is a mess. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was acquitted in two major cases of corruption and found guilty in another case for breaching trust, Haaretz reports. He has yet to be tried for his documented crimes against Lebanese and Gazan civilian populations during the various invasions he helped mastermind.

Even more wild is the Levy Committee’s “findings” on Israel’s status in the West Bank. The panel, appointed by Prime Minister Netanyahu and steered by former Supreme Court justice Edmond Levy, “rejects the claim that Israel’s presence in the territory is that of an occupying force and asserts that its settlements and settlement outposts there are legal.” The committee’s claims are based on its reasoning that any structure built with government encouragement (which, let’s be real here, means every Jewish settlement) holds an “administrative assurance” that confers permission to settlers to continue colonizing Palestinian land.

According to the Levy Committee, the West Bank is not at all occupied. In fact, the panel suggests opening the West Bank to all Israeli settlers, to overwrite and override land registries under Palestinian names, and to legalize all Jewish settlements, now and in the future.

But the report is flawed from the get-go and it makes me wonder why it is taken seriously in the first place. By asserting that the West Bank is not under Israeli occupation, the committee is classifying the West Bank in one of two ways. Either it is a sovereign territory belonging to someone else or it actually falls within Israel’s borders (an ever-shifting affair).

There is an overbearing Israeli military presence in the territory so we can eliminate the possibility of it being a sovereign land. The only other option, that the West bank is an Israeli territory, is just so farfetched that it defies the last six and a half decades worth of politics.

More important, however, are the implications such an assertion can have on Palestinian and non-Jewish residents of the West Bank. These groups of people would remain citizenshipless. The Palestinians in particular would be targeted, isolated, and far removed from the civil liberties afforded to settlers. This is a major cornerstone of apartheid.

In short, the Levy Committee argues one main point, that Israel is not an occupier but is, instead, a proud apartheid state.


There is one comment

  1. ontogram

    Yes. Israel has elected to be a bi-national state rather than an occupier. And it cannot survive 10 years as an apartheid state, proud or otherwise. The end result is bi-national and finally democratic and the end of the Zionist “dream” (nightmare) of a Jewish State. To even write “Jewish State” fills me with historical horror. The phrase is an anachronism like the words “colony” and “imperial.” Why anyone TODAY would desire, fight for, and conceivably die for such a program is beyond me.Given the evidence of Jewish “statecraft” (I use the term loosely!), wouldn’t it be best to simply say “Never mind!” and slink offstage? Zionism, like every other “ism” has more than earned the right to oblivion, having turned from its idealistic socialist origin (however Jewish it might have been) to the ugly face of hatred, rubber bullets and phosphorus bombs, not to mention Sheldon Adelson and “Bibi.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s