Ohio State’s Triple Helix tags Islam as “Nazism in the Middle East” [Resolved]

Update: The Triple Helix has confirmed that the tag has been removed. The publication uses an automatic tag-generator and this tag was regrettably and accidentally overlooked. According to the Triple Helix, “we do not endorse the view implied by the tagging”. I commend the Triple Helix for remedying the mistake in a timely and respectful fashion.

Editor’s note: The author of this Triple Helix article has indicated to me that he was not behind the offensive tag (see comment below). Rather, the tag was chosen by the publication. The author has also indicated that he will be contacting the publishers to have the tag removed. The contents of this article have been edited to reflect this information.

Every once in a while, if I’m lucky (or unlucky), I happen to stumble across something so offensive that I begin to question society’s ethical standards. In fact, this happens far too often and most of my day is spent wondering why people do the things they do or why they say the things they say.

In a post dated back to July 8, 2011, the Triple Helix at Ohio State University equated the Muslim Brotherhood and Islam to Nazism based in the Middle East. Something is very wrong with this picture.

I should provide you with some background. The Triple Helix is an international student-run publication that “addresses interdisciplinary issues in modern science”. The organization boasts at least twenty-eight chapters, many of which are based in the nation’s most elite universities. Seeking new writers and editors, the chapter hosted at my university sent out an email linking to the organization’s website. Naturally, I found the “Politics” tab to the left and, hoping to find insightful articles on the intersection between global health and public policy, clicked it. The second listed article commanded my attention with its bold title: “Muslim Brotherhood: A Different Breed of Islamists”. It was written anonymously by student writers at the Triple Helix at Ohio State.

Ignoring the condescending title (which refers to Muslims as ‘breeds’), the article’s content isn’t the most disagreeable. It blasts the United States’ intentional misunderstanding and mislabeling of the Muslim Brotherhood as a fundamentalist and illegitimate political group working in conjunction with Al Qaeda. The author goes so far as to identify the Muslim Brotherhood as a strategic ally for America, a moderate religious group, one that “’lures thousands of young Muslim men into lines for elections … instead of into the lines of jihad’”.*

So why, then, does the United States feel so threatened by an organization that apparently values the same civil liberties outlined in the U.S. Constitution (which, if I may add, seems to have been torn into thirty pieces and fed to a horse at about the same time the Patriot Act went into effect)? The author pins the problem primarily on Western media and its concerted efforts to paint the Muslim Brotherhood as just another terrorist offshoot.

In comes Google. The author points to Google’s new autocomplete function that automatically guesses the remainder of a search term based on previous popular Google searches. In July, typing ‘Muslim Brotherhood’ revealed “a very telling list of predictions … that includes ‘terrorism, Iran, and Al-Qaeda'”. Having tried this myself just moments ago, Google predicts “website”, “Obama”, and “terrorism”. The negative connotations are rife and this is, according to the Triple Helix, indicative of the “spoken and unspoken fears transmitted by the media to the mass public”.

It’s an interesting take on an even more interesting topic, but the article’s sheer arrogance, as you’ll soon see, outweighs its efforts to inform and ultimately contradicts its purpose. At the top of the article is a collection of tags. Some are classy: “Geography”, “Islamic Revival”, and “Islamic History”. Some are straightforward: “Politics”, “Egypt”. But one in particular devalues the article entirely: “Nazism in the Middle East”.

Nazism? The article itself doesn’t even contain the word. In fact, the word Nazi can only be found once on the website, in an article written about technology and war in February 2011. So why equate the Muslim Brotherhood, Islam, or “Islamism” to Nazism, a racist ideology condemned by Muslims worldwide?

I don’t have an answer for that question but I could give it a shot. Maybe it’s the sense of entitlement some Americans develop each time the United States aims its laser-guided democracy towards the Middle East. Or maybe over the course of reviewing the article, the publishers could no longer avoid the soothing shackles of Islamophobia (emphasis on shackles). Whatever the reason is, it’s offensive, highly derogatory, and backwards.

Note: The issue has been resolved. See the updates at the top of the article.

This is not a matter of misinterpretation. The tag “Nazism in the Middle East” is not meant to be shorthand for “Americans wrongly confuse Muslims as Nazis and that is offensive to all” because that could’ve been tagged simply as “Muslims aren’t Nazis”. Only the most despicable of individuals would have the audacity to associate Islam to Nazism. And even if the Triple Helix meant only for it to grab attention to the article, only the most arrogant of individuals would throw the association around loosely and for something as petty as page views.

The Western media does transmit a negative impression of Islam to the greater public, but with bonehead tags like the one found in the Triple Helix, a forum for the elite, it is clear that the publication has contradictingly joined the ranks of those it sought to enlighten.

Sami Kishawi

* According to the Triple Helix article, this quote is originally from: Leiken, Robert S., and Steven Brooke. “The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood.” Foreign Affairs 86.2 (2007): 107-121. Academic Search Alumni Edition. EBSCO. Web. 6 Feb. 2011.

There are 6 comments

  1. subika

    Can’t believe they wrote that! And even worse, on a forum for elite Universities? Have you thought about sharing what you’ve written here, as a link, on a comments box that the article may have? Or even getting in contact with the website’s creator/administrator to post your response?

  2. Zachary Karabatak

    Hi Sami,
    I’m Zachary Karabatak, the author of the aforementioned article. I wish you would have posted or at least linked your reply to my article; I might have found this sooner. You raise many valid concerns about the article’s tagging that were never brought to my attention. However, your usage of unfounded personal attacks is, at the very least, uncalled for. As a fellow Muslim, I have no incentive to denigrate Islam or its true followers. Even in the article I remark, “It is…imperative that the American people…and the Western Media start to distinguish…moderate Islam from radical Islam.”

    As for the tagging of the article, I am as disappointed as you are. Let me clarify that I did not tag the article. Seeing that you read the article, you obviously understand that it has nothing to do with “Nazism in the Middle East” (you even remark that “The article itself doesn’t even contain the word”). Thank you for pointing this mistake out to me⎯I’ll make sure to contact Triple Helix International and have the tag removed.

    With that aside, most of your points are baseless and sometimes contradictory. While you initially ask “Where was the author’s mind when this was written”, you later state that my content “isn’t…disagreeable” and is “an interesting take on an even more interesting topic”. You even do me the favor of summarizing my article, without any objections to its content. Evidently the answer to your offensive question is that my mind was in the right place at the right time. You also claim that my “article’s sheer arrogance outweighs its efforts to inform and ultimately contradicts its purpose”. With your focus on unwarranted inflammatory remarks, I hoped you would follow this assertion with some sort of support or analysis. Sadly, you have none. Should you happen to find any of the article’s content incorrect or unsupported, then please let me know.

    1. Sami Kishawi

      Unfortunately, your article was still tagged the way it was. You should probably get into the habit of reviewing your articles so that these kinds of mistakes don’t go unnoticed for five or more months.

      Regarding your clever language about unwarranted and inflammatory remarks, there was nothing in the article to indicate that you, the author, were not behind the offensive tag. This is the point of contention. I didn’t argue that the content of the article was unfounded (even though I have my own personal objections to some of the language you use, particularly the words “breed” and “moderate”); I argued that the tag was baseless and extremely offensive — which by all accounts it is. I operated under the reasonable assumption that the author chose the tags or at least had the opportunity to review them. I also operated under the presumption that the Triple Helix is too esteemed to pander to such derogatory language. However, since you’ve made it clear that you did not choose the offensive tag and that you do not approve of it, I will reflect the changes in an editor’s note.

      Muslim or not, it’s your responsibility to review your articles after publication especially when dealing with such sensitive matters.

  3. The Triple Helix Online

    Tags for articles are auto-generated in part using a wordpress plugin, and this one accidentally got overlooked. As evidenced by the 149 other articles we have published from students at some of the top universities in the world, The Triple Helix seeks to publish research based arricles devoid of hyperbole or offensive generalization. We do not endorse the view implied by the tagging. It was an honest mistake that has since been remedied. Thank you for bringing this to our attention (although a link would have been nice), and we have since removed the tag from the article. We hope that you can update this in your article as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s