Ohio State students mobilize after campus newspaper runs ad linking Muslim students to terrorism

Photo courtesy of Jana Al-Akhras

Outraged students at the Ohio State University have mobilized after The Lantern, the campus’s official student-run newspaper, published what they say is a discriminatory advertisement linking the Muslim Student Association to international terrorism.

Titled “Former leaders of the Muslim Student Association (MSA)”, the advertisement asks “Where are they now?” and lists nine MSA co-founders and former Presidents as having ties to alleged terrorist groups. One such listing describes Jamal Barzini as both a co-founder of the MSA and a close associate of Hamas.

The advertisement was paid for by FrontPage Magazine, an online publication funded by the David Horowitz Freedom Center, a national institution recognized for its harsh and derogatory stance against Islam.

The advertisement, printed on page 2 of the newspaper, drew immediate criticism for its direct assault on Muslim representation on American college campuses. According to Jana Al-Akhras, a 2nd year student and member of the university’s MSA, “it’s a blatant attempt at reinforcing stereotypes and causing widespread fear of Muslims on campus.” [Read more...]

The only extremists who aren’t terrorists

Terrorism is anything that invokes Palestinian national identity or criticism towards the occupation. However, what can be seen as the opening stage of a Kristallnacht-esque repeat against Palestinians — Muslim and Arab, specifically — is nothing too worrisome.

Illegal Israeli settlers, particularly those who attack Palestinians, vandalize their property, and even sabotage Israeli military bases, aren’t terrorists. They aren’t even militants. They are, according to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, just a small unrepresentative group of right-wing activists who happen to be a little overzealous in their convictions.

The last few days have seen a tremendous surge of violence in the West Bank. But it’s likely this information never received the attention it deserved since those committing the violence were, in fact, Israeli settlers. On Tuesday, dozens of settlers ambushed an Israeli military base and attacked military officials and their property as a sign of defiance against the measures taken to police them. The next day, settlers hurled rocks at Palestinians traveling through the Tapuach and Rechalim Junction. Another group of settlers torched three Palestinian-owned vehicles — two trucks and one car — just outside of Nablus. Meanwhile, arsonists set fire to a historical mosque in central Jerusalem after vandalizing it with anti-Islam graffiti. To top this off, settlers clashed with police after authorities attempted to arrest suspects in connection with the previous round of violence.

Israel was quick to identify these attacks as part of the growing “Price Tag” movement, but Netanyahu’s administration was split over how to label the settlers behind the destruction. Before anyone else could give it much thought, Netanyahu rejected the idea of labeling them terrorists and instead opted to refer to them as extremist right-wing activists. His logic: they are a small group of individuals whose actions aren’t necessarily mirrored by other settlers. [Read more...]

Before and after Eilat: Israeli air strikes are no different than militant rocket attacks

Photo by Mahmud Hams, AFP

How are Israel’s air strikes any different from the militant rocket attacks it so boldly denounces? This is sure to spark a poisoned debate — mostly because the general public is informed only to the extent that Fox News, for example, informs them, but ultimately because the more vocal individuals, the ones who hide behind a charade of objectivity, are just too intolerant and too one-sided to even consider the possibility that there really is another side to the coin, a side that can only be explored if the double standards are dropped and the context is expanded beyond Israel’s immediate borders.

Misinformed retaliation

In the wake of the Eilat attacks that killed upwards of eight Israelis on Thursday, August 19, Israeli politicians and their backers quickly issued statements of appeal, citing both their unshakable defense of Israel as well as their intent to, essentially, make “them” pay.

But who is “them”?

Within hours of the Eilat attacks, the government of Israel announced that it had discovered who was behind the attacks and that it would proceed with a timely and justified response. Here is Israel, a beacon of proper self-investigation (see: Goldstone), putting forth the effort to carefully and positively identify those responsible for the damage before retaliating. The United States Congress felt a fatherly goodness for having cultivated such a well-intentioned military machine.

According to the Israeli government (and only the Israeli government), the Popular Resistance Committee (PRC) organized the coordinated operations. Their headquarters and training bases would consequently be the prime targets in any forthcoming attack. Moments later, Rafah was bombed. At least six died, dozens injured, and millions more deceived.

According to both Haaretz and Ynet, Israel’s two most prominent daily news agencies, the Eilat attackers were chased down but not apprehended and in the short three hour span between the bus shooting in Israel and the air strikes in Rafah, Israel had no conclusive evidence to link the PRC to the attacks. Its strategy to surgically remove the PRC from the Gaza Strip was based solely on speculation.

Immediately following the Rafah bombings, the stunned PRC declared it played no role in the Eilat attacks and Hamas did the same. Still, armored personnel carriers and infantry units mobilized along the borders of the Gaza Strip and Israeli F-16s and drones loudly took to the skies. [Read more...]

MSM: ‘Bomb blast, shooting in Norway has Islamic feel to it’

From the very surprised and seemingly disappointed Guardian:

“Targeting government offices and the Labour party camp point to political agenda behind attacks rather than Islamist terrorism”.

A gunman dressed as a police officer shot and killed upwards of 80 people at a Labour Party youth camp on the small island of Utøya just hours after a car bomb killed seven individuals in Oslo’s government district. Police arrested a 32-year old Anders Behring Breivik, “who happens to be conservative Christian who enjoys classical music and the video game World of Warcraft“, in connection with the pair of attacks.

The news is still unfolding, and more is being revealed by the minute. But one thing is for certain: your local news program is more concerned with finding a hidden link to an “Islamist” group than with the actual devastation rattling the streets of Norway. [Read more...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,038 other followers