Human and civil rights need to be restored in Syria. To accomplish this, Bashar Al-Assad and his regime need to go. The regime’s replacements must be dignified, honest, just, and completely in contrast to the “leaders” Syria has seen in decades past. The destruction needs to end, and in its wake shall be a new era of Syrian history, a new body of Syrian pride that refuses to mirror any element of previous oppressive rules.
This much is clear. The sane and the rational agree on this end. But so many questions remain. What about the means? How do we get there? Is U.S intervention — historically problematic and guided by self-interest — the ultimate solution? Will Israeli air strikes on Syrian territory — an affront to Syria’s national autonomy regardless of what the targets may be — bring the end to within our reach? Should we just wait it out — death tolls climbing and all — and pray the opposition continues its slow but certain advance against regime strongholds?
And how about when we cover it, do we keep calling it a revolution or do we call it a civil war? Can it be both? At this point in time, considering the number of fallen civilians, of new refugees, of destroyed relics, is it both? [Read more...]








Is the FSA perfect?
Update, August 3: Agence France-Presse has reported that rebel leaders of the Free Syrian Army on Friday condemned the execution of Assad loyalists as “unacceptable, isolated and illegal” and have rejected responsibility for the killings. Earlier, however, one CNN correspondent reported that the Tawheed Brigade, comprised of FSA fighters, has already claimed responsibility for the executions. Nevertheless, it is promising to see FSA leaders openly denounce these kinds of acts and pledge themselves to the high standards set forth by human rights protocol and international law.
Is the Free Syrian Army (FSA) perfect? The straight answer is no. And I can’t understand how that fact has been twisted to justify something so horrific, so appalling.
Footage of what appears to be a mass execution in Syria emerged on YouTube yesterday. One of the individuals stripped down and killed in the 40-second burst of continuous gunfire has been identified as Ali Zeineddin al-Berri, reported to be a leader of a group of shabiha Assad loyalists. According to various sources, the executioners are FSA fighters and the victims are various members of the al-Berri family or tribe.
Since there is no indication that the roles have been reversed or that the shooters were the ones tied to Assad’s regime, I write this to all those who think the FSA is perfect. Because it isn’t.
Just because the FSA fights Assad does not make it an army of saints nor does it mean it is worthy of unconditional support. According to one senior legal adviser for Human Rights Watch, if the execution is indeed what it shows to be—members of the FSA shooting and killing prisoners in cold blood—then the FSA is guilty of committing a war crime. But that, for me, right now, is irrelevant. What strikes me is that the FSA has committed a very small fraction—but a fraction nonetheless—of the kind of thing its fighters have revolted against Assad for doing. [Read more...]