American Red Cross responds to absence of Palestine from database but fails to hide double-standard

Two weeks ago, I wrote a piece about my experience donating blood with the American Red Cross after finding out that Palestine had allegedly been removed from the organization’s database. The day after its publication, Director of Biomedical Communication Stephanie Millian responded with an explanation, which I will include in the following paragraph. But before I discuss the response, I want to clarify that the purpose of this reportage is to encourage the Red Cross to sidestep any attempts to normalize the occupation of Palestine by rejecting its existence, not to keep the Red Cross from accepting and utilizing blood donations that save hundreds of lives every day.

Here is Millian’s response:

Hi, I work for the American Red Cross in their biomedical services division. I am are sorry for your experience and are very appreciative that you stayed and donated blood, a truly lifesaving gift. I wanted to let you know that the American Red Cross uses the U.S. Government’s Health Information for International Travel reference tool as the source document to assess countries with a malaria risk. The guide does not include all countries in the world, but does include all countries with a malarial risk. There has been no recent change in the list and we apologize if our staff was mistaken about that fact. As you are aware and highlighted in your blog post, the Palestinian Red Crescent is a fully recognized member of the global Red Cross and Red Crescent network. Thank you again for taking time to share the gift of life with others.

Stephanie Millian, Director of Biomedical Communication
American Red Cross

I spent some time doing research about the Health Information for International Travel source document that Millian cites and found that it is put together every two years by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a federally-funded public health agency in the United States. The document, more informally known as the Yellow Book, identifies a diverse array of global health risks and highlights all recorded instances of disease outbreaks with a special focus on malarial transmission. The American Red Cross uses this guide to update its database of international travel destinations which is then used to determine whether or not someone is eligible to donate blood depending on the countries they’ve visited within a certain time period of time. [Read more...]

American Red Cross erases Palestine from database

The American Red Cross was hosting a blood drive at my university today so a friend and I stopped by. I would find out an hour later that my identity as a Palestinian was unverifiable.

Before donating any blood, nurses drew a blood sample and, following standard procedure, asked me a series of questions about my medical and travel history. When asked if I had traveled out of the United States within the last three years, I told the nurse that I had spent time in the Gaza Strip in Palestine. She couldn’t find it in the database.

For the next fifteen minutes, the nurse searched every plausible variation of the words Palestine and Gaza and even searched entire geographical regions.

“I remember seeing it there before,” she told me just as she called a field office for technical support.

By this time, she had committed the details of my travels to memory. “The donor flew to Cairo and took a four hour car ride to Gaza, in Palestine. He stayed there for four weeks and then returned, by car, to Cairo.” [Read more...]

Deconstructing Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers’ stale sack o’crap

A reader brought to my attention an article attempting to deconstruct a short essay I wrote on Gilad Shalit soon after Hamas authorities released him during the latest prisoner exchange. The article, published by “Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers”, asserts that I’ve hit a new low and that my essay is a “sack o’crap”. In keeping with the holiday spirit, we shall examine the author’s criticisms and show that the only “sack o’crap” that exists is the one fixed permanently at his or her doorstep.

The first thing the author fails to do is link to my article. This tactic can only be interpreted as a not-so-deceptive attempt at preventing his or her own readers from accessing the full essay. Sure, readers are free to find the article on their own, but citations and embedded links are a matter of professionalism and courtesy. Nevertheless, compared to the content of this attempted rebuttal, this is but a very trivial matter.

Also noticeable is the author’s skewed selectivism. It is a common strategy to quote only those lines or words that help build your case, but only as long as they remain in context. In this case, the author pulled less than a fifth of the article and managed to avoid commenting on the remaining four-fifths, the parts that deal with the Israeli government’s humanitarian abuses or Shalit’s role at the time of his capture. This will become more apparent in the coming paragraphs. [Read more...]

The Palestine Entries: 99-year prison term for being Palestinian

// Entry #23

His mother remembers the exact date: April 28, 2002. He was only 20 years old when Israel’s armed forces captured and arrested him, then sent him to an Israeli prison where to this day, he has yet to be formally indicted with a crime.

Hussain Mustafa Al-Loh missed out on his prime teenage years. His father was getting too old and too ill to work so in 1997, Hussain left school and joined the Palestinian Authority at age 15. According to his mother and youngest brother, he joined it for the paycheck, not to fight. For the next five years, he fed his family from his own hands. His other brothers were not yet ready for work.

Hussain’s work ethic propelled him up the ranks and by 1999, he was serving as one of Yasser Arafat’s personal body guards. Stationed in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Hussain was forced to travel through multiple Israeli checkpoints to reach Gaza City whenever he was able to visit family. He had been through the crossings and checkpoints multiple times over the years but in 2002, Israeli soldiers captured him in a seemingly arbitrary operation at the Erez Crossing and transported him to the maximum security Nafha Prison, notorious for having among the worst conditions in the Israeli prison system. [Read more...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,036 other followers