Why Palestinians won’t lend their voices to OneVoice and liberal Zionism

Guest contribution by Sami J.

The organization OneVoice claims to be a grassroots movement aimed at empowering Israelis and Palestinians to push their leaders toward a two-state solution. In practice, this has translated into a strategy overwhelmingly focused on what’s good for Israel — and specifically Israel’s Jews — while Palestinian suffering and rights are sacrificed on the altar of compromise. This problem was pointed out by PACBI back in 2010. And last week, it was thrown into stark relief when it was discovered that OneVoice had put out a shockingly racist Hebrew-only graphic, warning of the increase in the Palestinian population and what counteractions must be taken to preserve a Jewish majority in historic Palestine (a full translation can be found here).

In what can only be described as naked cynicism, while OneVoice was warning Israeli Jews of the “high” number of Palestinians, it was also seeking to collaborate with Palestinians in exile, specifically the Chicago Movement for Palestinian Rights (CMPR), a youth-led Palestine solidarity organization. CMPR understandably refused, issuing an open letter outlining their valid reasons. This did not sit well with liberal Zionist professor Mira Sucharov, who wrote a very patronizing piece on the need to refrain from (what she thinks are) frivolous accusations of racism and to work together to achieve peace (on Zionist terms, of course) instead.

When I challenged her on this, she responded that while she understands OneVoice’s message “stings”, Jewish yearning for national sovereignty is also important; and that the disagreement with OneVoice is “about feelings and narrative” where “collective emotions and historical memory are key”. [Read more...]

RedEye’s “Turban Primer” enables racist attitudes to persist

Guest contribution by Muhammad Shareef

I love the RedEye. It usually features a glimpse into what’s going on around Chicago, sometimes expanding on larger national events, but more importantly balancing its informational articles with just enough entertainment pieces to have turned me into a loyal reader each morning for the past three summers.

Yesterday morning was very different. I was shocked by the “Turban Primer” article published barely two days after a gunman shot and killed six worshippers at a Sikh Temple in Milwaukee. I usually refuse to dwell on isolated cases of racism, even those that explicitly target myself, because I recognize that almost all of the people I interact with are amazingly broad-minded human beings. But the “Turban Primer” was too blatant for me to ignore. So I write this with the simple hope of highlighting what I’ve come to notice.

The article shows five cartoon drawings of various men wearing turbans with the following descriptors: Sikh men, Iranian leaders, Taliban members, Indian men, and Muslim religious elders. The descriptors are followed by simplistic captions that are much better suited for Pokémon cards than for a publication of the Chicago Tribune. But looking beyond the ignorance in stereotypically categorizing turban “styles”, an editor at the RedEye saw it fit to educate the Chicago-area community on how to distinguish a Muslim wearing a turban as if to say that a mistake similar to Sunday’s should not happen again. [Read more...]

Thank God these uncultured Palestinians are coming around, The Times of Israel reports

Thank God for summer internships. And thank God these uncultured Palestinians are finally coming around. We can finally put an end to six and a half decades of conflict.

The Times of Israel recently published an unabashedly condescending piece about two Washington, D.C.-based interns—one Jewish, one Palestinian American—who swapped places for the summer and who seem to have figured out how to fix the Middle East. Featuring Waleed Issa from the Dheisheh refugee camp and former Israeli military officer Or Amir, the article is a textbook example of colonial rhetoric in which the privileged elite are noble and socially advanced while the colonized and oppressed are uncultured and naïve.

The first eight paragraphs deal with Waleed’s dramatically life-altering experience. “By sharing an office with them [Israelis and Jews], I’ve been struck by how they’re trying to do good things for the new generation,” Waleed is reported to have said. At first, he was “startled.” He even said “Holy moly!” But then he became an addict of Israeli news and a firm believer in sharing his feelings. Moral of the story so far: If only Palestinians weren’t so close-minded, they might actually recognize that Jewish Israelis are only trying to help them.

Or receives much less attention in the story because, for her, working with Palestinians is “less jarring.” Her Sephardic Jewish heritage makes her an expert in dealing with Arabs. “[T]he art, food, and culture feels very familiar,” she says, smartly. She also served as an officer with the Israeli military’s Medical Corps. Waleed is impressed. The article’s author absolutely insists Or spent her time saving Palestinians. Waleed, even more impressed now, begins to see a “different angle about the Israeli army.” What’s the moral of the story now? Because Jewish Israelis are so much more cultured, they know how to relate to others. Plus, they’re really into saving the Palestinians who clearly can’t save themselves. [Read more...]

Recognizing common humanity ten years later

Guest contribution by Shirien D.

I was a freshman in high school—in first period art class—when it happened. Half way through, Alan, a kid in my class, received a text and told everyone that the Japanese had attacked us. We didn’t take him seriously, particularly because Alan had a reputation for being the class clown. I brushed it off.

In second period, I was in honors biology class. Our teacher, Ms. O’Donnell, explained to us what happened. “They attacked New York,” she said, in a voice that was calm on the surface but had worrying undertones. She proceeded to roll out a TV and turn on the news. As we watched, one of the twin towers collapsed. All of us were completely in shock, sitting wide-eyed in silence. Finally, a student raised her hand and broke the silence.

“Who did this? I heard it was the Japanese. Are they trying to get back at us for bombing them all these years later?”

Yup, that was the rumor at my school.

“Hun, I don’t know who did this. I wish I knew,” Ms. O’Donnell replied. Ms. O’Donnell was the teacher who we always looked to for all the answers, but this time she didn’t have any. No one did. We were all afraid and although she tried her best to hide her emotions, so was she.

During third period English, we would hear the intercom go off every five minutes or so, calling down students whose parents were waiting for them at the principal’s office, ready to take them home.

By fourth period lunch, the school was half empty. The cafeteria was eerily quiet.

By fifth period physical education class, everyone was so consumed with fear that we weren’t allowed to go outside for our usual soccer activities. My P.E. teacher warned, “Chicago might be next. We have to play it safe, guys.” And somehow, that meant our small, southwest suburban school about forty minutes from Chicago might get attacked along with the Sears Tower. [Read more...]

‘Suicidal Syrians under Gaddafi’s orders and on Hezbollah’s payroll attempt to occupy Israel’ and other ridiculous concoctions

Ynet’s latest editorial does what bigotry does best: distort the facts, paint the victim as the uncivilized savage, and liken him to terrorist thugs. You’d think we’ve moved on from the colonialist mindset that ‘those there dark people are always up to no good’.

Less than a day after more than a dozen Syrian nationals and Palestinian refugees were gunned down by Israeli soldiers during a Naksa commemoration protest in the Golan Heights, I stumbled upon a number of internet comments that attempted to wipe the soldiers clear of any wrongdoing. Some notable quotes include:

“[T]hey [are] armed and assembling in masses outnumbering border patrol agents and hurling incendiaries at explosives and purposely trying to harm border patrol agents.”

“A patrol of IDF troops, with limited riot gear on hand spot hundreds of people coming from an enemy state trying to break down the border. They had to respond. Get real here.”

“I mean it’s not really the IDF’s fault that the ‘peaceful demonstrators’ didn’t know how to properly blow things up and ended up blowing themselves up, but mines were basically blowing up right on the border.”

To summarize the conversation, readers are meant to blame the Syrian protesters for the IDF shooting. Apparently, they came bearing gifts of Molotov cocktails and played cat-and-mouse with Israeli soldiers in a field of landmines. Then the protesters proceeded in forcing the soldiers to shoot upwards of twenty Arabs in order to make headline news in Syria. When the fun finished, each protester traveled to a Hezbollah hideout to collect $1,000 each for participating in a concerted effort to take over Israel.

But it gets worse: this ridiculous concoction is reproduced in a feature editorial. [Read more...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,016 other followers