To Israel, one man’s journalist is another man’s terrorist

Guest contribution by Deanna Othman

As Palestinians prepare to mark the 65th anniversary of al-Nakba on May 15, the date that symbolizes the beginning of the methodical dispossession and oppression of Palestinians, they have been greeted with a slap in the face by Washington, DC’s Newseum in another attempt to delegitimize and stifle their struggle.

The Newseum, which features exhibits both on news history and contemporary media technology, announced the names of 82 journalists who died covering the news in 2012, and added them to the Newseum’s Journalists Memorial in a ceremony held May 13 in the Journalists Memorial Gallery. Among the honored were Marie Colvin and Anthony Shadid, who both died in Syria.

Absent from the list of 82 journalists were an additional two names originally slated to be included — Hussam Salama and Mahmoud Al-Kumi, who were doing camera work for Al-Aqsa TV when they were killed by an Israeli airstrike in Gaza in November 2012.

The Newseum announced Monday that the museum will “re-evaluate their inclusion as journalists on our memorial wall pending further investigation.”

Although many held out the hope that the Newseum would stand by its decision, it is a grave disappointment, but not a complete surprise, that yet another institution that purports to celebrate diversity of voices has caved under Zionist pressure. [Read more...]

Repudiation of the West does not define Islam

Guest contribution by Deanna Othman

On May 1, Foreign Policy magazine published a piece by Yair Shamir with the headline “Our Shared Islamist Enemy: From Boston to Israel, radicals are attempting to destroy Western culture.”

Shamir’s piece endeavors to draw baseless parallels between the Boston Marathon bombings and the resistance of Palestinians against the Israeli occupation, what he inaccurately portrays as an “aggressive and offensive jihad, unconnected to any particular conflict or borders, which conjoins Islamist terror groups around the world.” His unabashedly Zionist agenda rears its head through this opportunistic attempt to play into the media circus surrounding the Boston bombings.

His ludicrous argument essentially states that the problem is not Hamas or Al Qaeda, the problem is not Osama Bin Laden or Dzokhar Tsarnaev: the problem is Islam.

Unfortunately, the Boston bombings have given virulent propagandists and Islamophobes a field day. While various pundits and media personalities jumped to the Tsarnaev brothers’ religious identities as the singular motive for their alleged acts of violence, they focused on them as individuals, and how their thought processes could have been perverted by purported religious radicalization. What makes Shamir’s contention particularly disturbing is his sweeping generalization that all groups and individuals affiliated with Islam, from Hamas to the Muslim Brotherhood, to the Tsarnaevs and Sayyid Qutb, all had a particular end in mind—the obliteration of Western culture. [Read more...]

The ways we contribute to the Palestinian cause

I recently met an inspiring young Palestinian woman just months away from becoming a certified physician. She did not speak of her accomplishments but it was very obvious that she had worked hard to excel in college, in medical school, on her national board exams, and in her life outside of being a model student. Even so, she expressed guilt at having been too busy with school to follow the news and the politics as much as she would have liked.

This raised a very interesting question: Must you be outwardly or actively political to contribute to the struggle for Palestinian rights?

My initial answer was no. It wouldn’t be fair otherwise. The more I thought about it, the more convinced I became in that answer. [Read more...]

Israel does not deserve to be admitted to the Visa Waiver Program

Guest contribution by Jareer Kassis

In a recent Haaretz article, Amira Hass reported that Israel denied yet another American citizen of Palestinian descent re-entry into the occupied West Bank. As always, the Israeli authorities invoked the perpetual “security risk” excuse without bothering to elaborate on why an American high-school teacher who held a position at a Quaker institution in Ramallah was deemed a threat. While denying entry of Americans who belong to a particular ethnicity into Israel or the territories it controls (and is required by the Oslo agreements to grant access to) is almost routine, it comes as the U.S. Congress is considering granting Israeli citizens visa-free entry into the United States. If Israel is allowed to join this “Visa Waiver Program (VWP)”, it would necessitate the Secretaries of Homeland Security and State having to lie.

Both the House and Senate versions of the bill include a stipulation that, for Israel to be admitted to the VWP, both the Secretaries must determine that:

The Government of Israel has made every reasonable effort, without jeopardizing the security of the State of Israel, to ensure that reciprocal privileges are extended to all United States citizens.” (Emphasis mine.)

The evidence gathered over multiple reports spanning the last few years shows that Israel’s treatment of United States citizens is anything but reciprocal. As early as 2006, then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice complained to the Israeli foreign minister (the undeservingly respected Tzipi Livni) about the ill-treatment of Palestinian-Americans by Israel, and also promised later that year to “ensure that all American travelers receive fair and equal treatment”. Yet the reports of Americans humiliated and/or denied entry at Israeli borders are abundant. [Read more...]

Why Palestinians won’t lend their voices to OneVoice and liberal Zionism

Guest contribution by Sami J.

The organization OneVoice claims to be a grassroots movement aimed at empowering Israelis and Palestinians to push their leaders toward a two-state solution. In practice, this has translated into a strategy overwhelmingly focused on what’s good for Israel — and specifically Israel’s Jews — while Palestinian suffering and rights are sacrificed on the altar of compromise. This problem was pointed out by PACBI back in 2010. And last week, it was thrown into stark relief when it was discovered that OneVoice had put out a shockingly racist Hebrew-only graphic, warning of the increase in the Palestinian population and what counteractions must be taken to preserve a Jewish majority in historic Palestine (a full translation can be found here).

In what can only be described as naked cynicism, while OneVoice was warning Israeli Jews of the “high” number of Palestinians, it was also seeking to collaborate with Palestinians in exile, specifically the Chicago Movement for Palestinian Rights (CMPR), a youth-led Palestine solidarity organization. CMPR understandably refused, issuing an open letter outlining their valid reasons. This did not sit well with liberal Zionist professor Mira Sucharov, who wrote a very patronizing piece on the need to refrain from (what she thinks are) frivolous accusations of racism and to work together to achieve peace (on Zionist terms, of course) instead.

When I challenged her on this, she responded that while she understands OneVoice’s message “stings”, Jewish yearning for national sovereignty is also important; and that the disagreement with OneVoice is “about feelings and narrative” where “collective emotions and historical memory are key”. [Read more...]

Mansaf Debate: The case for Palestinian mansaf

Guest contribution by Jareer Kassis

Let me make it clear from the outset: I have no stake in mansaf. If it is served, I eat it; if it is not, I don’t crave it. It is reasonably tolerable on the palate if prepared correctly (more on that in a minute) but it is certainly not a delicacy that you should indulge in too often if you hope to live long enough to see your grandkids. But regardless of whether you love it or hate it, you are highly likely to encounter this behemoth of a meal if your family origins are from a town within a 100-mile radius of the Dead Sea. Therefore, my piece of advice to you is simply as follows: If you have to eat it, make sure it is made in Palestine.

I can already hear howls of protest: “But mansaf is a Jordanian dish!” Well of course it is! We Palestinians have more common sense when it comes to avoiding artery-clogging meals (well, slightly). If mansaf was good enough to be a Palestinian dish, obviously you’d have seen it offered at the Harvard Business School cafeteria next to “Israeli” hummus. No, it absolutely is a Jordanian concoction, and it is even considered the Jordanian national dish—which is fine when you realize that it is the only “national” artifact the Jordanians can claim to be proud of (considering even their national anthem sounds like an out-of-tune preamble to an actual theme that never arrives). [Read more...]

Fatah in Gaza: Surprised?

Hundreds of thousands of Fatah supporters gathered in Gaza City on Friday to mark the political faction’s 48th anniversary. Years of back and forth political repression meant that Fatah supporters weren’t so outspoken in Gaza and, until recently, Hamas supporters kept low profiles in the West Bank. But the real surprise, which I think many people aren’t openly admitting, has to do with the sheer size of the Fatah rally. As one colleague asked me, “since when are there that many Fatah supporters in the Strip?”

When I traveled to the Gaza Strip in 2011, I arrived under the impression that anyone with allegiance to Fatah and the Palestinian Authority would have already left to the West Bank or even to Egypt. But little did I know, just months before my arrival, as part of what I suspect to be a package deal from a previous reconciliation attempt, Hamas eased up on its limitations and allowed Gaza residents to display support for Fatah where the yellow flags and Fatah shields had previously been banned. [Read more...]

Thoughts on the Newtown shooting from halfway around the world

Guest contribution by Syazwina Saw

Living on Twitter is a precarious existence.

Events do not manifest themselves well in just 140 characters. What you get are soundbites and facts, retweeted as endorsement or vilification, made popular by approval or mockery. When I joined Twitter in the end of 2008, I became a spectator to the Iranian revolution which died almost as soon started. And then there was Egypt, which continues to be a battlefield of ideals, beliefs and morals. Sometimes we fixate on details. Sometimes these prove to be insights.

And when you live several continents away from the United States, as I do, then waking up in the morning means bracing yourself for whatever happened eight hours ago. Before I went to bed on Friday night, I saw tweets of people sending prayers to Newtown, but without further detail.

And we woke up to the news of 20 children murdered at school.

Names and ages of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, California, published on the front page of the New York Times.

Names and ages of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, California, published on the front page of the New York Times.

My timeline today is a picture of shared grief, horror and disbelief. It is an outpour of sympathy and vilification, of prayer and condolences, of anger and blame. The online debate immediately turned to gun control and mental health, and within the heady brew of blood and politics, a few facts are mentioned again and again:

Eighteen hours before the shooting in an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, Michigan’s State Senate pushed through a bill which allows people to carry a gun or rifle into schools and kindergartens. Obama continues to champion the use of drones in Afghanistan and other countries in order to target terrorists, but which generates a high number of civilian casualties, many of them children. Israel continues to receive funding from the US, most of which goes into the Israeli Defense Forces – two days ago, an IDF soldier killed 17-year-old Muhammad Al-Sulaymah who was bringing home a cake to celebrate his birthday. [Read more...]

Understanding the mounting pressure against Joy Harjo’s ‘halfway justice’

In the days following Native American poet Joy Harjo’s decision to cross the picket line and to perform at Tel Aviv University, many have taken the disappointment from friends, colleagues, and fans as a sign of the boycott movement’s “with us or against us” attitude. But that is an unfair characterization of a growing movement that is more “all or nothing” than anything else.

I’ll start with a very basic premise: there is no such thing as halfway justice. There is no in-between. And in the case of an oppressor-oppressed system as clear as the one we see in Israel’s systematic abuse of Palestinian human rights, there is no middle ground.

So when Harjo chose to act against the Palestinian civil society’s Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) call, even after countless petitions and expressions of concern were directed her way, and when she tried to make up for it by scheduling a visit to the West Bank, she had made her point clear. She had tried to forge a middle ground where none could exist.

Her decision to travel to the West Bank elicited very mixed reactions. Some saw it as a sign of support. Harjo insisted she had initially been misinformed, that she was just beginning to learn about the boycott. Still others felt it was a disingenuous decision to save face. [Read more...]

When +972′s privileged journalism belittles the Palestinian struggle

Effort can be appreciated. But when the effort is spent on lazy, privileged journalism that belittles a struggle and an entire population, that is when the effort needs to be stopped in its tracks and addressed.

+972 Magazine co-founder and contributor Yuval Ben-Ami recently published a piece recounting an evening he spent watching over Gaza’s skies as Israel shelled the territory from above and as Palestinian fighters returned fire, arguably in response to the four Gazans that had been killed earlier in the day.

He had bravely chosen to leave behind his cappuccino that morning and make his way from Tel Aviv to a kibbutz just beyond Sderot, about as close to Gaza’s border as a civilian could get.

There he joined a group of likeminded photographers hoping for the best shots. In essence, they were banking on human tragedy, a military assault, quite possibly the deaths of innocent civilians, to give them a photograph and a story they could use for their own personal gain.

They waited, “looking down at impoverished, futureless Gaza and at neglected southern Israel, secretly hoping for them to burn for our amusement,” Ben-Ami writes. It is a chilling sentence. What is worse, though, is that this problematic language, its self-righteous tone, and its patronizing attitude toward Palestinians is reflected in virtually every letter of every word of every sentence in this piece.

One can easily — word emphasis: easily — make the argument that this privileged and rather offensive reportage is common to +972, because it is. But Ben-Ami has provided us with an excellent example and that is what we will examine for the time being. [Read more...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,015 other followers