A history of Palestinians in the Press Photo of the Year contest

Since 1955, the Press Photo of the Year award has gone to the most telling of photographs, the ones that capture, contain, and organize the most reality and raw emotion in a rectangular field of pixels. Each photograph presents a narrative of the human condition and is oftentimes the strongest visual representation of an era of importance. They catalyze change by attracting the world’s visual attention.

Of the fifty-four photographs honored with the distinction, three feature Palestinians as the subjects. Three. The first shows Palestinian refugees fleeing from their homes again in 1976 during civil war in Lebanon. The second, from 1982, reveals the aftermath of the Sabra and Shatila massacre. The third, taken in 1993, shows Palestinian children raising toy guns as a sign of defiance at the close of the First Intifada. You’d think, then, that giving the world three opportunities to witness the realities lived by Palestinians would prevent the perpetuation of such injustices, no?

Here are the photographs with brief captions.

1976

Palestinians flee the La Quarantaine district of Beirut, Lebanon in January 1976. What makes this photograph especially moving is the context behind it, the fact that these refugees were remade into refugees. The father likely experienced the same rocking explosions almost three decades ago when he was a child, and now his children get to follow in his footsteps. (Photo by Françoise Demulder) [Read more...]

A brief deconstruction of “Sh*t People Say About Israel”

Pro-Israel students, under the guidance of The David Project, recently joined the “Sh*t [people] say” internet craze on YouTube with their own video, “Sh*t People Say About Israel”. Filmed at the University of Illinois at Chicago, the film clearly takes aim at supporters of the Palestinian cause and patronizes them as ignorant and misinformed. But the video fails on so many levels. Let’s see what kind of “Sh*t” these student hasbarists have to say.

1. Israel doesn’t even want peace.

If it did, it probably wouldn’t be incarcerating children or building concrete barriers through Palestinian villages or preventing Arabs from marrying Israelis or arming fanatical settlers colonizing the West Bank or demolishing homes or tearing through olive tree groves or shooting high velocity tear gas canisters at the faces of unarmed demonstrators.

2. I heard everyone there is in the army.

In Israel, military service is compulsory for all citizens above the age of 18. Recruits serve between two and three years and are given the opportunity to extend their service. Clearly, not everyone in Israel is in the military at any given moment, but the mandatory service means that most adult citizens have, at one point or another, served as an active military unit involved in the maintenance of a condemned and illegal occupation of Palestine.

Mind you, there does exist a refusenik subculture in Israel, but unless these individuals refuse to join the military for religious reasons, they are often stigmatized and prosecuted under Israeli law. Maya Wind, for example, spent forty days in a military prison for refusing to join the Israeli military on the basis that she could not agree with the military’s illegal activity towards the Palestinian people.

[Read more...]

MSNBC highlights Israeli abuse, shows soldier driving trailer over Palestinian body

Featured in MSNBC’s “The Week in Pictures” is a photograph of a Palestinian man screaming in agony as an Israeli soldier drives a tractor-hitched trailer over his legs.

It’s a heartbreaking photograph, and the stone cold and carefree attitudes of the soldiers surrounding the man literally adds insult to injury. But first, a backstory: In the West Bank village of Al-Dirat near Al-Khalil, a group of Palestinian construction workers prepared the equipment and materials necessary to begin the construction of a new home. Soon after, a half-dozen or so Israeli soldiers appeared at the scene and ordered the workers to cease construction.

Almost as suddenly as their arrival, the hostile soldiers commandeered the equipment and ordered the Palestinian workers to disperse. At least one soldier boarded a tractor and, although it is unclear what exactly he aimed at, drove the vehicle’s attached trailer over one of the workers. The worker had reportedly been protesting the unfair expulsion of him and his fellow construction workers. Hazem Bader with Agence France-Presse (AFP) captured the photograph above, as well as the first of the two photographs below.

I expect people to argue that the soldier didn’t deliberately run the man over. I was not at the scene but here’s a question for these people: Do you drive over speed humps without noticing? I find it hard to believe that the soldier didn’t feel or notice the resistance from the man’s body as the wheels lurched up and over him. It’s just not practical. [Read more...]

In defense of FouseyTube

FouseyTube is all the rage these days. But lately, this 22-year-old college student from California seems to be attracting as much negative attention as Newt Gingrich. The only difference is, I don’t think it’s fair or even justified. You don’t have to be a fan, but stooping so low is going to break your back before it breaks his.

Yousef Erakat, operating under the stage name FouseyTube, is a Palestinian-American entertainer who devotes much of his downtime to producing parodies, “vlogs”, and comedy sketches to upload to YouTube. After joining YouTube just ten months ago, Erakat’s video’s have gone viral and collectively boast over 15 million views. He has since become a YouTube partner and is now on tour performing sets at community centers and schools throughout the United States. But his quick rise to fame has been met with a great deal of heat and the ad hominem attacks on his character are getting far too out of hand to let slide any longer.

Every entertainer realizes at one point or another that the content of his or her work is entirely subjective. Some will laugh, others won’t. Some will find pleasure in a comedy routine and others will want to put their foreheads on the table. Erakat, a comedian himself, knows this all to well. I am sure he doesn’t set his sights on the impossible feat of evoking laughter from every single person in the world at any given time.

Still, much of the criticism leveled against Erakat is that he simply isn’t as funny as people make him out to be. I’ve come across comments ranging from “he’s bland now” to “even his loved ones never thought he was funny” to “no self-respecting person would dare watch his videos”. Therein lies the problem. The first comment is perfectly acceptable. It’s an opinion. Not everyone is obliged to think he’s funny. The second comment is a rude judgment. Since when did the Erakat family befriend internet trolls and share with them family secrets (assuming this particular one to be true)? And the third comment reeks of arrogance. Is society expected to conform to one individual’s perception of something as subjective as a one-man comedy skit? I’ve watched a few of Erakat’s videos. Does this mean I disrespect myself? If I spinelessly conform to that particular audacious comment, would I be respecting myself again? [Read more...]

Chinese-speaking Netanyahu will probably not send personalized YouTube message to Palestinians

.

Israel’s diplomatic standing in the world has sunk so low that its government has undertaken the monumental task of salvaging its political interests through YouTube.

Earlier today, the Prime Minister’s office released a video of Benjamin Netanyahu speaking Chinese and wishing the Chinese people a blessed new year. The message is, for the most part, intensely hopeful, almost as if asking China to kindly ignore Israel’s flagrant violations of human rights, civil rights, and international law and help Israel carry on with its economic ventures.

Among Netanyahu’s closing remarks is his enthused assertion that “we [the Israelis and the Chinese] are two ancient peoples whose values and traditions have left an indelible mark on humanity”. But I’m certain any Chinese viewer will recognize that the “mark on humanity” he’s referring to is the collection of craters left throughout the Gaza Strip after Israel pounded the coastal territory for twenty-two days and nights.

Here’s my question, though. Is he planning on sending to every country but Palestine a personalized greeting? Oooooh, my feelings are so hurt.

Ohio State’s Triple Helix tags Islam as “Nazism in the Middle East” [Resolved]

Update: The Triple Helix has confirmed that the tag has been removed. The publication uses an automatic tag-generator and this tag was regrettably and accidentally overlooked. According to the Triple Helix, “we do not endorse the view implied by the tagging”. I commend the Triple Helix for remedying the mistake in a timely and respectful fashion.

Editor’s note: The author of this Triple Helix article has indicated to me that he was not behind the offensive tag (see comment below). Rather, the tag was chosen by the publication. The author has also indicated that he will be contacting the publishers to have the tag removed. The contents of this article have been edited to reflect this information.

Every once in a while, if I’m lucky (or unlucky), I happen to stumble across something so offensive that I begin to question society’s ethical standards. In fact, this happens far too often and most of my day is spent wondering why people do the things they do or why they say the things they say.

In a post dated back to July 8, 2011, the Triple Helix at Ohio State University equated the Muslim Brotherhood and Islam to Nazism based in the Middle East. Something is very wrong with this picture.

I should provide you with some background. The Triple Helix is an international student-run publication that “addresses interdisciplinary issues in modern science”. The organization boasts at least twenty-eight chapters, many of which are based in the nation’s most elite universities. Seeking new writers and editors, the chapter hosted at my university sent out an email linking to the organization’s website. Naturally, I found the “Politics” tab to the left and, hoping to find insightful articles on the intersection between global health and public policy, clicked it. The second listed article commanded my attention with its bold title: “Muslim Brotherhood: A Different Breed of Islamists”. It was written anonymously by student writers at the Triple Helix at Ohio State.

Ignoring the condescending title (which refers to Muslims as ‘breeds’), the article’s content isn’t the most disagreeable. It blasts the United States’ intentional misunderstanding and mislabeling of the Muslim Brotherhood as a fundamentalist and illegitimate political group working in conjunction with Al Qaeda. The author goes so far as to identify the Muslim Brotherhood as a strategic ally for America, a moderate religious group, one that “’lures thousands of young Muslim men into lines for elections … instead of into the lines of jihad’”.* [Read more...]

What’s more surprising than TIME’s twentieth most surprising photo? Its caption

TIME released on Monday a set of what its photo editors call “the Most Surprising Photos of 2011“. Photograph #20 caught my attention for obvious reasons.

The photograph carries the following caption:

May 15, 2011. An undercover Israeli policeman dressed as a Palestinian woman opens a car door after detaining a Palestinian protester during clashes in Shuafat refugee camp, in the West Bank near Jerusalem. Israeli security forces had been on alert for violence on Sunday, the day Palestinians mourn the “Nakba,” or catastrophe, of Israel’s founding in a 1948 war, when hundreds of thousands of their brethren fled or were forced to leave their home.

There’s something eerily twisted about this image. After hearing about these people, these supposedly menacing Palestinians donning traditional garb and waving around guns, for so long, it is ironic that the only example I’ve ever seen happens to be of an undercover Israeli. In this sense, I can see why this photograph was included in this set.

But what is more surprising is the photograph’s caption. I’d expect a respectable news publication like TIME to be a bit more conscience or at least accurate about its interpretation of history. [Read more...]

Tweeting with the Israeli military

Almost immediately after an Israeli soldier fired a tear gas grenade at Mustafa Tamimi’s face, IDF Central Command Spokesman Major Peter Lerner made a mockery of the attack that left Tamimi dead a day later. He and the Israeli military argue that his tweets have been taken out of context, so let us see for ourselves.

Lerner makes little to no mention of Tamimi until after a separate Twitter user publicly urges the Israeli military to let an ambulance into Nabi Saleh, the village in the West Bank where Tamimi had been attacked. Lerner responds by claiming Tamimi is on his way to a hospital. However, he fails to mention that Israeli soldiers prevented a Red Crescent ambulance from reaching a bleeding Tamimi by holding it for an indefinite period of time at a makeshift checkpoint alongside an Israeli watchtower.

Three of Lerner’s next four tweets about Mustafa Tamimi are about the lack of photographic evidence showing how Tamimi was acting before an Israeli soldier aimed a tear gas grenade at his face. Apparently, Lerner is of the mindset that a photograph of Tamimi throwing a small rock at an armored jeep will exonerate the Israeli military of any misdoings. [Read more...]

What does Chicago Friends of Israel have to say about throwing its propaganda away?

One and a half years ago, University of Chicago student group Chicago Friends of Israel (CFI) tacked flyers to announcement boards throughout campus advertising Israel as the only country in the Middle East where freedom of the press exists. But with Israeli journalists organizing emergency meetings to defend their right to free expression, what will CFI have to say now?

This Sunday, Israel’s top journalists gathered for an emergency conference in Tel Aviv to prepare responses to what can only be seen as an assault on free press. The downsizing and closure of Israeli media outlets has struck discord among Israeli media representatives, but the ultimate source of concern is an amendment to the current libel law that loosens the definition of slander to potentially include that which is considered critical of the government. The amendment has already been approved by a Knesset committee and is expected to be approved by the majority of the Knesset soon. [Read more...]

Photo: Removing Freedom Riders while waving the banner of apartheid

Updated: Quick — they are going to make an argument. Critics of the Palestinian Freedom Rides, the ones who take aim at anything that challenges the established forces of injustice and occupation, are bound to argue that this isn’t an issue of apartheid or segregation, that Palestinians are allowed on settler buses, that Palestinians are beating a dead horse.

Here, then, is Huwaida Arraf being removed from a public settler bus traveling the roads of the occupied West Bank. She and five other Palestinian Freedom Riders were forcefully removed from Bus 148 initially headed to Jerusalem.

“She was removed not because she’s Palestinian but because she didn’t possess proper travel documents. This isn’t apartheid, this is civil law,” the very same critics will caption. But let us not forget that Jewish settlers unlawfully residing in Palestine don’t require these travel documents — documents that are nothing short of permission slips selectively issued by the Israeli government.

The settlers aboard Bus 148 were carefully moved to another bus that quickly made its way through the Hizmah checkpoint and out to Israel. Meanwhile, the six Freedom Riders were driven to a police station where they were removed and detained by Israeli soldiers and officers. They have since been released, but not after facing verbal abuse, fines, and the implementation of tactics and techniques once seen wherever apartheid and segregation existed.

To the critics, the staunch defenders of Israeli policy, this photograph defines the realities of institutionalized injustice and the valiant efforts to elevate humanity. Huwaida was removed because she is Palestinian, because as a Palestinian, she isn’t allowed to move freely between the neighborhoods and cities of her own home, because as a Palestinian, she is denied the right to travel by an Israeli government proudly waving the banner of apartheid.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,590 other followers