Consider this a Nakba special. Here, an individual (to be initialed AE) presents his reasoning for why Israel should cut power supplies to the Gaza Strip this coming summer to make up for any of Israel’s power deficiencies. His text will be in bold. My responses will be in italics.
Israel isn’t directly at fault for the lack of power in Gaza. True, Israel did bomb the power plant in 2006 but its been 6 years and, while Israel (and Egypt) attempted to stop building materials from getting into Gaza they were obviously unsuccessful (there was plenty of smuggling as evidenced by the huge amount of rockets fired from Gaza (just from the beginning of 2007 until mid-June of 2008 there were 4,117 rockets fired from Gaza)
Right off the bat, a contradiction. This is going to be good. First, AE contends that Israel is not to be held responsible. But then he immediately cites the 2006 bombings that destroyed much of the main power system in the Gaza Strip. And let us not forget the carnage of 2008-2009 that intentionally damaged Gaza’s power grid. Thinking he can get away with seeming so intellectual, AE also throws in some stats: 4,117 rockets fired from Gaza from 2007 to 2008. What he forgets to mention is Israel fired 14,617 heavy artillery shells into Gaza in just 18 months, from September 2005 to May 2007, according to Human Rights Watch.
Presumably, the Gazans could have used the building material for a power plant but, once again, they prioritized murdering Israeli civilians over caring for their own citizens.
I take it AE doesn’t consider it murder when a uniformed military force lays siege to a surrounding strip of territory for twenty-two straight days.
Israel should not be obligated to give free electricity to those who chose to use the building materials that could have been used to create that electricity in order to attempt to kill as many of the civilians who are providing the electricity as they can.
First, Israel does not “give free electricity”. It sells it. By this point, one would assume this is common knowledge. And second, maybe this is just a grammatical concern of mine but AE should learn how to construct complex sentences with more than one object. In this case, civilians are not the ones providing electricity. [Read more...]







“
“
“


Latest tactic: Rebranding the Nakba as a Jewish tragedy
This is the latest in cultural rebranding, a strategy bent on erasing historical or cultural fact and taking up a modified version of the fact as one’s own.
According to this individual, the Nakba represents the ethnic cleansing of Jews, too, by Israeli and Arab armies. In other words, a Palestinian tragedy has been rebranded into a Jewish one. It’s a distasteful move, partly because it is written under the pretense of historical accuracy but also because it simply ignores Palestinian agency.
The Nakba, commemoration on May 15 every year, marks the first full day of Israel’s establishment as a state. It also honors the 750,000 Palestinians forcefully displaced from their homes and made into refugees—not on May 15, 1948 but over a course of years well before Israel’s unilateral declaration of independence. [Read more...]